t(4;14) and genomic instability in
high-risk myeloma
P. Leif Bergsagel, MD
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona
Rochester, Minnesota
Jacksonville, Florida
t(4;14) dysregulates MMSET and FGFR3
FGFR3
MMSET
1
bkpt
3
120 kb
3'E
11


3'E

E

bkpt
24

14
E
VDJ
Chesi et al, Nat Genet 1997
Chesi et al, Blood 1998
4
1

Clinical detection of t(4;14) in MM
Flow, cIg-FISH, RT-PCR
1
2
C2
.1
2
.1
.2
.6
l
S1
S1
M1
M
3
M
929
KM
UT
MM5
H
JIM
KM
OP
MMT
MMT
MMT
MM.
PB
tonsi
I/JH-MMSET on der(4)
Co-expression of FGFR3 and MMSET in MM patients
2

Better OS in t(4;14) with bortezomib induction
Bortezomib-Dexamethasone
VAD
AVET-LOISEAU, JCO 2010
3

MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and
53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites
Pei H, Zhang L, Luo K, Qin Y, Chesi M, Fei F, Bergsagel PL, Wang L, You Z & Lou Z.
Nature 2011 (470)124
Patient Tumors are Stable Over Time
Three changes in one patient and no changes in second patient
Keats JJ et al, unpublished
4

Summary of the Paired Analysis
First Hit
Progenitor
Diagnosis
Relapse
No Changes (36%)
1-38 Months (Median 13)
Gains & Losses (
36%)
Only New Changes (
29%)
6-29 Months (Median 21)
3-65 Months (Median 18)
9-61 Changes (Median 26)
1-15 Changes (Median 5)
Relapse
Relapse
Keats JJ et al, unpublished
Relationship Between Changes and Subtype
Keats JJ et al, unpublished
5

Clinical course of a patient with t(4;14) MM
Keats JJ et al, unpublished
Chromosome 8
Keats JJ et al, unpublished
6

Keats JJ et al, unpublished
Effective re-treatment of MM with full dose bortezomib
7

Suboptimal bortezomib treatment alters disease course
Chesi et al, unpublished
Aggressive MM can stimulate or eradicate indolent MM
Chesi et al, unpublished
8

Drug response in transplanted Vk*MYC MM
Remarkable activity of HDACi+Bortezomib
Chesi et al, unpublished
Possible clinical implications of genomic instability
and intra-clonal heterogeneity in high-risk MM
·
Argues for combination vs sequential therapy (E.g., RVd instead
or Rd followed by Vd)
·
Selection of pre-existing resistant clones by low-dose
maintenance therapy more likely with high-risk MM
·
For drugs used in maintenance, the initial exposure should be
when the tumor burden is lowest
·
There are more genetic changes following relapse from
melphalan then from agents that do not target DNA
·
Melphalan may be harmful to high-risk MM (that are not in CR)
·
Melphalan is best used following a maximal cytoreduction so that
the fewest possible MM cells are exposed to its mutagenic
effects
·
Early treatment (e.g., smoldering MM) may preferentially
eradicate "good" myeloma, making room for "bad" myeloma
9

Collaborators
Bergsagel Lab
Marta Chesi
Jonathan Keats
Mayo Clinic
Mike Kuehl
Keith Stewart
Jonathan Licht
Rafael Fonseca
Zhenkun Lou
19
10