Anti-angiogenic therapies for
Multiple Myeloma
Shaji Kumar, MD
Associate Professor
Division of Hematology
Scottsdale,
Scottsdale Ari
A
Ari ona
z
Rht
Roches
h ter
t ,
er Mi
M
Mi
t
nneso a
t
Jk
Jack
i
sonv lille,
ill Fl
F
Fl i
or d
ida
id
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Disclosures
· Research Funding for Clinical
Clinical Trials
­ Celgene, Millennium, Novartis, Bayer
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Ai
Angiogenesis and cancer
· Increased angiogenesis and its contribution to
cancer has been recognized for
for decades
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Folkman 333Comprehensive
(26): NEJM,
Cancer
1757,
Center
December 28, 1995

Pro- & anti-Angiogenic
Factors
· VEGF
· Ai
Angiost t
a itin
·bFGF
+
-
· Endostatin
·PDGF
· Arresten
·EGF
· Canstatin
· Ang1, Ang2, TIE2-mab
· Tumtatin
· Ephrins
·Restin
·HGF
· Prolactin
· MMP
· Vasostatin
· Thrombin, Tissue factor
· Kininostatin
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Bevacizumab (Avastin)
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Is angiog
ggenesis relevant in
myeloma?
Angiogenesis is increased in myeloma
Normal
compared to MGUS, and increase with
disease progression
MM
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
May
Va
o Clinic
cca et al,
Comprehensive
BJH, 87 (3), 503
Cancer
(1994);
Center
Rajkumar et al, Clinical Cancer Research 6, 3111, (2000)

Angiogenesis is a prognostic factor
1
.8
ng
.6
survivi
P = 0.02; n = 400
.4
ortion
Low MVD
Prop .2
0
High MVD
MVD
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Time (months)
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Kumar et
Comprehensive
al, ASH Abstracts
Cancer
2005
Center

BM
Bone Marrow Angiogenesis
Angiogenesis is
is increased
increased in
correlates with other biological
plasmacytoma and is a prognostic
features in myeloma
factor for progression
Bone marrow microvessel density
l
corre t
a es
ith
w
· plasma cell labeling index
· Presence of circulating plasma
cells
· Cytogenetic abnormalities like
13q-
·ISS stage
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Kumar et al, Blood, 2003, 101 (5), 1715

Angiogenesis in myeloma:
Why and how?
· Likely multiple mechanisms are involved in
the increased angiogenesis seen in the
marrow and plasmacytomas in myeloma
· Endothelial cells: functionally abnormal or
structurally?
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Marrow angiogenic activity and disease
stage
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Kumar,
Comprehensive
S. et al. Blood
Cancer
2004;104:11
Center
59-1165

Id
Inducers of angiogenesis
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Tumor necrosis factor alpha
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Fibroblast growth factor-2
Hepatocyte growth factor
Insulin-like growth factor-1
Macrophage inflammatory protein-1
Monocyte chemotactic factor-1
Stromal cell-derived factor-1
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Ribatti et
Comprehensive
al, Oncogene
Cancer
(2006) 25,
Center
4257­4266

Angiog
ggenic cytokines in
myeloma
VEGF
· The cytokine contribution by the individual cell does
not appear
pp
to change
g with disease progression
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Kumar, S. et
Comprehensive
al. Blood
Cancer
2004;104:1159-1
Center
165; Leukemia (2003) 17, 2025­2031

Clonal abnormality of ECs?
·
Increased circulating endothelial cells
with disease burden
·
Clonal abnormalities present in
circulating endothelial cells
·
Di ti
s
t
nc gene expression
fil
pro es have
been described for the myeloma
endothelial cells compared to normal
endothelial cell
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer
Rigolin, G.
Center
M. et al. Blood 2006;107:2531-2535 ; Vacca et al

How does angiogenesis help?
· Endothelial cells in myeloma have multiple
multiple
effects on myeloma cells
· Studies in 5T2MM model suggest that
di
decrease in
l
norma hypoxic st t
a e f
o
marrow may lead to selective survival
d
a
t
van age for CD45- tl
tumor ce llls
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

MM1.S
350000
HUVEC
HUVEC+MM1.S
300000
250000
200000
m
cp 150000
Endothelial cells stimulate
100000
myeloma cell growth in vitro
50000
0
0
2
4
8
12
16
20
24
Huvec number (X1000)
OPM2
U266
140000
120000
HUVEC
HUVEC+U266
HUVEC
HUVEC+OPM2
120000
100000
100000
80000
80000
m
m
60000
cp
60000
cp
40000
40000
20000
20000
0
0
0
2
4
8
12
16
20
24
02
4
8
12
16
Huvec number (X1000)
Huvec number (X1000)
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Dexamethasone
MM1.S
Huvec+MM1.S
lro 120
nto 100
C
80
eof
60
Endothelial cells protect
tag
40
n
20
rcen
0
Pe
0
0.01
0.05
0.1
0.5
1
myeloma cells from drugs
Drug Conc(µmol/L)
Revlimid
MM
MM+HUVEC
HUVEC
60000
50000
40000
00
m 30000
cp 20000
10000
0
01
5
10
50
100
Drug Conc (µmol/L)
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

HUVECs stimulate multiple sig
pgnaling cascades in
myeloma cells
When MM1 S
. cells were cultured in contact with a confluent layer of HUVECs,
multiple signaling cascades were induced in the MM cells.
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Human bone marrow derived
endothelial cells
·
Similar results were obtained when MM1.S cells were grown in
co-culture with bone marrow derived endothelial cells from
patients with MM.
·
MM1.S cells were added to the confluent layers of BMEC and
then harvested at different time points.
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Neutralizing antibody
gy to IL-6 partially
py abrogates
g
the
stimulatory effect
Effect of IL-6 Neutralizing Antibody
+ Huvecs
200
l 180
ro 160
ont 140
C 120
eof 100
10
tag
80
60
rcen
40
Pe
20
0
0
0
15
1.5
6
25
Antibody Conc (g/mL)
IL6 Antibody
Hours
6
4
2
0246
0
2
4
6
pSTAT3
pAkt
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
pErk
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Neutralizing antibody to
to VEGF
VEGF partially
partially abrogates
abrogates
the stimulatory effect of HUVECS
Effect of VEGF Neutralizing Antibody
+ HUVEC
80000
70000
60000
50000
m 40000
cp
30000
20000
10000
0
0
0
200
400
1
Anti-VEGF Ab (ng.mL)
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Endothelial cells
cells increase
invasiveness of MM cells
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
I Vande Broek, Leukemia (2004) 18, 976­982

Myeloma ECs
ECs secretes
chemokines
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Pellegrino et al, BJH, Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages 248-256

Is angiogenesis a reasonable
reasonable
target?
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

"Anti-angiogenic" therapies for
myeloma
· Two paradigms:
· Drugs with
ith known actitivitity in
l
mye oma, with
ith
anti-angiogenic activity
·Drugs which are "targeted"
gg
to be anti-
angiogenic
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Thalidomide and angiogenesis
Pre-MVD Post-MVD
45.0
40.0
35.0
30.0
25.0
VDM 20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
Responders
Non-responders
Kumar et al, Leukemia (2004) 18, 624
Vacca et al, JCO, 23, 2005: 5334
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Lenalidomide and anti-
angiogenesis
Lentzsch et al, Leuk
i
em a (2003) 17
17, 41
41­44
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Dredge et al, Microvasc Res, 69, 56-63

Bortezomib
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Roccaro, A. M. et al. Cancer Res 2006;66:184-191

Targeted "anti-angiog
ggenic"
therapies
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Kumar et al, Blood. Podar et al

Phase II:Bevacizumab +
Thalidomide
· Relapsed myeloma
· Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg iv q 2 weeks alone
(in thalidomide
thalidomide exposed
-
patients)
· Versus a randomized comparison of
bi
bevaci
b
zuma
/
+ ­ th lid
a
id
om e 50 400
­
mg/day (in thalidomide naïve patients)
· 12 patients were enrolled
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Somlo et al, Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2005 106: Abstract 2571

Phase II:Bevacizumab +
Thalidomide
· Fatigue, neutropenia, hypertension
· Median time to progression for 6 pts on
bevacizumab alone was 2 (1 4)
­
months.
· Progression-free survival for 5 evaluable
ti
pa
t
en s t
t
rea d
e with bevaci
b
zuma
d
an
thalidomide is 6 +, 7, 8 +, 10, and 30 +
th
mon s
· Closed due to poor accrual
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Somlo et al, Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2005 106: Abstract 2571

Phase II:Bevacizumab +
Len/Dex
· Relapsed or refractory MM, failing >1
therapy, with no previous exposure to
lenalidomide
· No current history of unstable
cardiovascular disease or
or uncontrolled
thrombosis
· 4k
4 week cycle:
­ lenalidomide 25 mg PO d1­21
­ bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV every two weeks
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive
Raschko et
­
Cancer Center
al;
dexamethasone
Blood (ASH Annual Meeting
40
Abstracts)
mg
2007 1
PO
10:
q
Abstract
week
1173

Phase II:Bevacizumab +
Len/Dex
· 17 pts enrolled, ages 53­
53 ­89, with median
number of previous regimens 3 (range 1­
6)
· 10 pts completed 4 cycles and evaluable
for response
response.
· 7/ 10 pts had a PR after median of 2
cycles
· Fatigue, DVT (2) and dyspnea (due to
bevacizumab)
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
·N
Raschko et
o
al;
h
Blood
ypertension
(ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2007 110: Abstract 1173

Pazopanib (GW786034B)
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo
Podar
Clinic
K.
Comprehensive
et.al. PNAS
Cancer Center
2006;103:19478-19483

Pazopanib (GW786034B)
· Open-
Open label, single arm phase IIII trial
trial in
patients with relapsed/refractory MM
· 800 mg pazopanib p o
. . daily
· 21 pts were treated: median age 59 yrs
(2
(range 9
29 74)
-
;
· All pts were heavily pre-treated, including
86% with > 4 prior chemotherapy
regimens and 71% with prior stem cell
transplantation
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Prince et al, XIth International Myeloma Workshop and the IVth International Workshop

Pazopanib (GW786034B)
· Duration of treatment 14 to 279 days
· No clinical responses; 18 (86%) were
discontinued due to disease progression;
progression;
· 2 (10%) discontinued due to toxicity
· Nausea, fatigue, hypertension, epistaxis,
and headache most common toxicities
· No venous thromboembolism
· PK data paralleled that in RCC, OvCa,
sarcoma studies
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sorafenib
· Sorafenib is a bisaryl urea designed to
specifically target
­ VEGFR2 and
­ Raf kinase by binding to its ATP binding site
· Hd
Has demonst t
ra d
e ii
in v t
itro
di
and in vivo
efficacy in a broad range of cancers
­ renall
l ce lll, hepatocelll l
u ar,
l
co on, breast,
pancreas, and ovarian cancer
· Ct
Curren ltly
d
approve for t
t
rea
t
men f
o renal
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
cell carcinoma.
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sorafenib in vitro activity
120
RPMI
ANBL6
Kas6/
Ka
1
s6/
100
MM1.S
OPM2
LR5
l)
80
tro
Dox40
noC
MM1.R
fo
60
%(yitil
IC50
biaV
40
20
0
MM1.S
OPM-2
0
0.01
0.1
0.5
1
2
5
10
Drug Concentration (Mol)
0
1
2
4
6
0
1
2
4
6
Hours
Mcl-1
pERK
pAkt
pSTAT3
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Actin
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sorafenib in vitro activity
Cytotoxicity in primary patient cells
100
cc 90
tito 80
po 70
p
60
0 µM
fao 50

5 M
µM
e
40
10 µM
tag
30
20
ercen
10
P
0
Pt 1
Pt2
Pt3
Pt4
Pt5
Pt6
Pt7
Pt8
Patient Number
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sorafenib-antiangiogenic
activity
200
Sorafenib + Myeloma marrow plasma
180
160
Sorafenib Alone
140
lle 120
lW
tron 100
o
fCo
80
%
60
40
20
0
Positive
Negative
m
M
M
Control
Control
1n
nM
10nm
50nM
0n
1uM
Drug
1nm
10
10nm
50
No
100nM
1u
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sorafenib clinical trials
· Sorafenib single agent phase 2 ongoing in
SWOG
· Two Phase 1/2 trials of sorafenib +
bt
bortezomib
ib ongoing
· Phase 1/2 trial of sorafenib + lenalidomide
currently accruing
yg
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sorafenib + RAD001
90
80
70
Sorafenib
60
Rapamycin
leb
Combinatio
t n
ia 50
v
llse 40
C% 30
20
10
0
U266
RPMI
MM1R
MR20
Cell line
· Phase 1/2 clinical trial ongoing
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sunitinib
· Inhibits VEGF and PDGF receptor
· Active in renal cell cancer
· Oi
Ongoing h
p ase 2 st d
u y
d
sponsore by
CTEP
· Currently accrued 14 patients
· Results awaited
· Fatigue, hypertension, heme toxicity
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

VEGF Trap
· Tightly binds VEGF
· CTEP sponsored Phase II trial ongoing
· IV over 1 hour on day 1
· Repeated every 2 weeks for up to 6
courses
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Other agents in clinical trial
· Bevacizumab + Bortezomib
· ENMD-2076: activity against Aurora A and
multiple tyrosine kinases
· Vatalanib (PTK787):VEGF Receptor
I hibit
n
or
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center

Conclusions
· Bone marrow endothelial cells a valid
valid
target based on studies so far
· Likely that targeted disruption of
endothelial cells or its interaction with MM
cells may not work alone
· A combined approach with a myeloma cell
tt
target d
e th
therapy may make th
the tumor cellls
more susceptible
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center