We are international
Donate
TEXT SIZE   
back

International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Molecular Classification of Multiple Myeloma
The intent of this statement is to provide a biological classification of multiple myeloma and to establish the prognostic value of known genetic factors.
07.09.10

INTERNATIONAL MYELOMA WORKING GROUP MOLECULAR CLASSIFICATION OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA1

The intent of this statement is to provide a biological classification of multiple myeloma and to establish the prognostic value of known genetic factors.

Myeloma is divided at the highest genetic level into two subtypes: disease that is hyperdiploid (h-MM), and disease that is non-hyperdiploid (nh-MM). The non-hyperdiploid type is characterized by immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) translocations and is generally associated with more aggressive disease and shorter survival.

Accurate prognostic determination of disease course allows for a more rational selection and sequencing of therapy approaches and more direct discussion with the patient regarding disease threat. Risk stratification is essential for better understanding of the composition of patients in clinical trials, and also allows, to some degree, cross-comparison of different clinical trial populations.

Testing Recommendations

  • At a minimum, baseline genetic information should be obtained in all MM cases
  • Testing must be done with either cytoplasmic immunoglobulin-enhanced FISH or FISH carried out on the nuclei from purified plasma cells
  • Minimum FISH panel should include t(4;14)(p16;q32), t(14;16)(q32;q23), and 17p13 deletions
  • More comprehensive panel should include testing for t(11;14)(q13;q32), chromosome 13 deletion, ploidy category, and chromosome 1 abnormalities
  • At a minimum, all clinical trials should consider incorporation of GEP

Disease sub-types
Hyperdiploid

  • Characterized by trisomies
  • More indolent form of the disease
  • Tendency toward more favorable outcome
  • Slightly more common among males
  • More common in elderly individuals
  • Higher incidence of MM bone disease

Non-hyperdiploid (higher-risk) myeloma, with the exception of t(11;14(q13;q32), which is good risk:

  • t(11;14)(q13;q32)
    • 15% of MM patients
    • consequent upregulation of cyclin D1
    • associated with CD20 expression, lymphoplasmacytic morphology, hyposecretory disease, and lambda light chains
    • majority of all cases of IgM MM
    • one half of all cases of light chain amyloidosis
    • can be observed in MGUS
    • disease can be heterogeneous; global effect on prognosis neutral

  • t(4;14)(p16;q32)
    • short remission duration after high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support
    • new treatments to target the translocations (ie TKI-258) being developed
    • associated with IgA heavy chains, lambda light chains, and chromosome 13 abnormalities
    • less common in patients with MGUS
    • present more frequently in patients with SMM (smoldering multiple myeloma)

  • t(14;16)(q32;q23)
    • 5-7% of all MM cases
    • associated with higher frequency of chromosome 13 deletion
    • associated with IgA isotype
    • more aggressive clinical outcome

  • Chromosome 13 deletion
    • Significance as a marker now thought to be as a surrogate of its association with nh-MM
    • Detected in 50% of patients; 85% of chromosome 13 deletions are monosomy, and 15% interstitial deletions
    • Closely associated with other high-risk genetic features like t(4;14)(p16;q32)
    • Nearly 90% of cases with t(4;14)(p16;q32) will harbor chromosome 13 deletion

Secondary genetic events that reflect disease progression
Monoclonal plasma cells can undergo different stages of evolution over time; it has not been well defined what the specific steps associated with disease progression are. Genetic abnormalities that reflect progression include:

  • Deletion of 17p13
    • Most important cytogenetic factor for prognostication
    • Locus of the tumor-suppressor gene, p53
    • Very negative effect on survival
    • Predicts for shorter survival, more aggressive disease, higher prevalence of extramedullary disease, hypercalcemia, short duration of response post-HDT, and CNS involvement
    • Most cases of plasma cell leukemia (primary and secondary) have p53 abnormalities
    • Uncommon in MGUS

  • Chromosome 1 abnormalities (1p deletion and 1q amplification)
    • Abnormalities in both short and long arms of chromosome 1 associated with shorter survival
    • GEP signature for high-risk disease

mSMART Classification
Another method of interpreting the significance of genetic mutations in myeloma has been published by the Mayo group as mSMART 2.02

High-Risk

Intermediate Risk

Standard-Risk

FISH

FISH

All others, including

Del 17p

t(4;14)

hyperdiploid

t(14;16)

Cytogenetic deletion 13 or hypodiploidy

t(11;14)
t(6;14)

t(14;20)

 

 

GEP High-risk signature

Plasma Cell Labeling Index > 3%

 

  • Note that intermediate- and standard-risk patients with these factors will be classified as high-risk by GEP
  • Standard-risk patients with LDH>ULN and beta2M>5.5 may indicate worse prognosis
  • Prognosis is worse when t(4;14) is associated with high beta2M and anemia
  • T(11;14) may be associated with plasma cell leukemia

Recommended FISH testing and association with outcome

Essential testing

FISH Tests

Testing Frequency

Established markers

T(4;14)(p16;q32)

Once

 

T(14;16)(q32;q23)

Once

 

17p13

May be repeated

Expanded panel; markers with modest effects

Hyperdiploidy

Once

Other markers

T(11;14)(q13;q32)

Once

 

Chromosome 13

May be repeated

 

Other translocations

Once

Chromosome 1

1q amplification, 1p deletion

May be repeated

aCGH-derived markers

12p deletion, 5q amplification

May be repeated

Emerging Genetic Tests: clinical and research recommendations

Level

FISH Tests

Testing Frequency

Established markers

Minimal FISH panel (clinic)

Once (baseline)

 

GEP

May be repeated

Suggested tests

aCGH/SNP

Once

 

Predictive markers

Once

 

Serial GEP

Repeated

New proposed IMWG molecular cytogenetic classification

 

Percentage of patients

Clinical & lab features

Hyperdiploid

45

More favorable, IgG-kappa, older patients

Non-hyperdiploid

40

Aggressive, IgA-lambda, younger individuals

Cyclin D translocation

18

 

t(11;14)(q13;q32)

18

Upregulation of CCND1; favorable prognosis; bone lesions. Two subtypes by GEP

t(6;14q)(p21;32)

2

Probably same as CCND1

t(12;14)(p16;q32)

<1

Rare

MMSET translocation

15

 

t(4;14)(p16;q32)

15

Upregulation of MMSET; upregulation of FGFR3 in 75%; unfavorable prognosis with conventional therapy; bone lesions less frequent

MAF translocation

8

Aggressive

t(14;16)(q32;q23)

5

Confirmed as aggressive by at least two series

t(14;20)(q32;q11)

2

One series shows more aggressive disease

t(8;14)(q24;q32)

1

Unknown effect on outcome, but presumed aggressive

Unclassified (other)

15

Various subtypes and some with overlap

1R. Fonseca et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia (2009) 23, 2210-2221.

2Kumar et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2009 84:1095-1110, Revised and updated: June 2010

 related articles
International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Guidelines for Serum Free Light Chain Analysis in Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders
International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Molecular Classification of Multiple Myeloma
International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma
IMWG Guidelines for the Prevention of Thalidomide- and Lenalidomide-Associated Thrombosis in Myeloma
IMWG consensus statement on the role of vertebral augmentation in multiple myeloma
IMWG Guidelines for the Management of Multiple Myeloma Patients Ineligible for Standard High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
IMWG Criteria for the Diagnosis of Myeloma and Guidelines for the Diagnostic Work-Up of Myeloma
IMWG Guidelines for Facilities and Services for the Management of Myeloma Patients
IMWG Guidelines on Imaging Techniques in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Multiple Myeloma
IMWG Guidelines for the Use of Bisphosphonates in Myeloma


You might also be interested in:

International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Guidelines for Serum Free Light Chain Analysis in Multiple Myeloma and Related Disorders
The following guidelines from the International Myeloma Working Group describe the potential uses of the serum free light chain (SFLC) assay and distinguish which uses have proved their utility and which are still undergoing investigation.

International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Molecular Classification of Multiple Myeloma
The intent of this statement is to provide a biological classification of multiple myeloma and to establish the prognostic value of known genetic factors.

International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma
The criteria reconcile various previously used systems for assessing response and have been universally adopted.

IMWG Guidelines for the Prevention of Thalidomide- and Lenalidomide-Associated Thrombosis in Myeloma
Myeloma patients have the highest risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of all cancer patients. The oral immunomodulatory drugs, thalidomide and lenalidomide, further increase that risk. The following guidelines from the International Myeloma Working Group recommend a prophylaxis strategy based upon a risk assessment model.

IMWG consensus statement on the role of vertebral augmentation in multiple myeloma
Recommendations of the IMWG on role of minimally invasive percutaneous injection of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), first developed as "vertebroplasty" in France in the late 1980s, as treatment for painful vertebral compression fractures (VCFs).

IMWG Guidelines for the Management of Multiple Myeloma Patients Ineligible for Standard High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
A panel of the IMWG consisting of experts in clinical medicine, clinical research, health services and related disciplines (biostatistics, medical decision-making, patient-physician communication), and a patient representative reviewed all the evidence-based myeloma practice guidelines and randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses published in English between December, 2004 and December, 2008. The following guidelines for the management of myeloma patients who are not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant are the result of the panel's findings.

IMWG Criteria for the Diagnosis of Myeloma and Guidelines for the Diagnostic Work-Up of Myeloma
Criteria for a diagnosis of myeloma followed by the examinations, tests, and imaging studies that are recommended by the Working Group for the diagnosis of myeloma and related organ dysfunction.

IMWG Guidelines for Facilities and Services for the Management of Myeloma Patients
The most important feature of any clinical unit established to care for myeloma patients is the training and expertise of the medical staff. 

IMWG Guidelines on Imaging Techniques in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Multiple Myeloma
Up to 90% of myeloma patients develop osteolytic lesions, a major cause of morbidity and mortality, during the course of their disease. Appropriate use of imaging techniques is essential to identify and characterize skeletal complications resulting from MM and to evaluate disease progression.

IMWG Guidelines for the Use of Bisphosphonates in Myeloma
The following guidelines for the use of bisphosphonate therapy in myeloma are based on IMWG and Mayo Clinic Guidelines and are intended to provide safe criteria for bisphosphonate use and maximize the risk-benefit ratio.